Asser International Sports Law Blog

Our International Sports Law Diary
The Asser International Sports Law Centre is part of the T.M.C. Asser Instituut

Sporting nationality and the Olympic Games: selected issues by Yann Hafner (University of Neuchâtel)

Editor’s note: Yann Hafner is a Phd researcher at the University of Neuchâtel specialized in sports and nationality issues. He is also Legal Affairs Manager at the Fédération Internationale de Volleyball. Yann is an editor of the ASSER International Sports Law Blog and has previously published on the blog on nationality conundrums at the FIFA World Cup 2014 in Brazil (see here).  

This contribution aims to decipher the relationship between sporting nationality and the Olympic Games. To this end, the author will first define sporting nationality and discuss athletes’ eligibility in national team in the context of the Olympic Games. Then, selected issues in relation with sporting nationality and the Olympic Games (with an emphasis on issues related to the Rio 2016 Olympic Games) will be investigated. More...



Regulating the human body in sports: Lessons learned from the Dutee Chand case - by Dr Marjolaine Viret & Emily Wisnosky

Editor's note: Marjolaine Viret and Emily Wisnosky are both editors of the ASSER International Sports Law Blog specialized in anti-doping matters, they are also involved in the World Anti-Doping Commentary project funded by the Swiss National Science Fund.

Introduction

A remarkable aspect of the run-up to the 2016 Rio Olympic Games was the stream of negative media reports portraying broad-scale public mistrust in sport, with the most prominent topic being the doping scandals in athletics and questions surrounding the participation of Russia.  

A different controversy, but one also directed at the credibility of sports, has exposed a few female Olympians to repeated, and at times rather intrusive, media scrutiny. In June 2016, it was reported that Indian track-and-field athlete Dutee Chand had qualified for the Rio Olympic Games by breaking the national record, thus to become the first Indian athlete to run the 100m at the Olympics since 1980. The attention that Dutee Chand’s qualification attracted within international media, however, was not related only to her outstanding results. It came as part of a medical, ethical and legal controversy that has existed for many years relating to ‘policing’ the male versus female divide in sports. Another athlete who has found herself in the midst of this controversy is South African runner Semenya Caster, whose participation in the Olympics has been the object of much conjecture.

The divide between male and female athletes forms the core of most sports’ competition rules, including athletics. The justification for this basic divide has rarely been questioned as such, but has been a matter for debate when it comes to handling atypical situations on both sides of the ‘dividing line’ ­ such as ‘transgender’ or ‘intersex’ athletes. A category of athletes that has, especially, been viewed as a challenge to the divide is composed of female athletes affected by ‘hyperandrogenism’, a health condition that results in naturally elevated androgen levels, including testosterone levels.

On 24 July 2015, a CAS panel rendered a decision involving Dutee Chand (“Dutee Chand” or “the Athlete”) that has fuelled the ongoing debate about the policies regulating hyperandrogenism in sport. Much has been reported in the media about the case: controversial issues include whether the CAS was the appropriate forum to assess these questions; whether the decision was appropriate, both on the merits and on the procedure; and what the consequences of the CAS award would be, for the parties, for athletics and for the sporting community at large.

Much like the current crisis surrounding doping in sports, the public attention on women with (proven or suspected) hyperandrogenism is driven by a concern that an athlete’s physiology – natural or artificially induced ­ could distort competition, destroying the ‘level playing field’ that supports the Olympic ideal. Both topics are also often brought back to the goal of protecting an athlete’s health. Parallels are further found in the strong reactions both topics evoke, and the steps taken by the regulating authorities to convince the public that everything in their power is being done to preserve a level playing field.

A less obvious but equally important point of comparison can be found in the issues both topics raise concerning the legal validity of decisions made by sports organizations, especially in a science-related context. This blog focuses on those more ‘legal’ aspects, through the prism of the decision of the CAS in the Dutee Chand matter and its legal implications. After touching briefly on the background of the case, we will comment on two aspects of the Chand award with respect to challenges in regulating hyperandrogenism in sport within the confines of the law: First from the viewpoint of a CAS panel called upon to evaluate the validity of a set of regulations, and second from the viewpoint of the sports organizations seeking to both adequately protect fairness in sport and to provide a legally valid (and effective) regulatory solution.[1]

More...


International and European Sports Law – Monthly Report – July 2016 - By Marine Montejo

Editor’s note: This report compiles all relevant news, events and materials on International and European Sports Law based on the daily coverage provided on our twitter feed @Sportslaw_asser. You are invited to complete this survey via the comments section below, feel free to add links to important cases, documents and articles we have overlooked. 

The Headlines

The McLaren Report on Russia’s State Doping System

It is difficult not to start this monthly report without referring to the never-ending Russian doping investigation that is shaking the sporting world. On 18 July, the independent investigation on Sochi 2014 winter Olympics led by Prof. McLaren, a Canadian law professor, and requested by the World Anti-Doping Agency (“WADA”), released its report. It confirmed evidence of widespread, State-sponsored doping in Russian sports and called for a full ban on the country from the next Rio Olympics. In response to the report, the International Olympic Committee (“IOC”) vowed to take the “toughest sanctions available”. However, and despite the race against time in the run-up to Rio 2016, the IOC delayed its decision for several days amid a WADA statement and several press articles calling for a ban of Russia from Rio Olympics. Meanwhile, it did open an investigation against Russia’s sports minister, Vitaly Mutko, the head official who allegedly supervised the overall doping cover up and explored all possible legal actions against Russia. On 21 July, the Court of Arbitration for Sport (“CAS”) rejected the appeal of the Russian Olympic Committee and 68 Russian athletes against the International Association of Athletics Federations (“IAAF”) decisions to suspend All Russia Athletics Federation (ARAF) from IAAF membership given the evidence of a state-sponsored doping system. As a consequence, Russian track and field athletes were also banned from Rio 2016 Olympics. With the IAAF welcoming this decision, one could think that nothing was standing in the way of a full Olympic ban for all Russian athletes. While some Russian athletes announced that they would appeal the CAS award to the Swiss Federal Court. Yelena Isinbayeva, the banned pole vault champion, even took it a step further by claiming that she would challenge the IAAF decision as far as the European Court of Human Rights. Yet, it is very improbable that any of these challenges be decided in time for the Rio Games.More...

Brexit and EU law: Beyond the Premier League (Part 2). By Marine Montejo

Editor's note: Marine Montejo is a graduate from the College of Europe in Bruges and is currently an intern at the ASSER International Sports Law Centre. 


Part 2. EU competition law and sports funding

The first analysed impact of Brexit on sport was the one regarding EU internal market rules and free movement. However, all sport areas that are of interest to the European Union will be impacted by the result of the future Brexit negotiations. This second part of the blog will focus on EU competition law and the media sector as well as direct funding opportunities keeping in mind that if the UK reaches for an EEA type agreement competition law and state aid rules will remain applicable as much as the funding programs.  More...


With or without them? Russia’s state doping system and the Olympic fate of Russian athletes. By Antoine Duval, Kester Mekenkamp and Oskar van Maren

On Monday 18 July 2016, Canadian lawyer Richard McLaren presented the Independent Person Report to the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA), regarding the alleged Russian doping program surrounding the 2014 Sochi Winter Olympics. The report was expected to seriously threaten the participation of Russian Athletes to the rapidly approaching Rio Games, starting on 5 August. In the weekend prior to the report’s publishing, Reuters obtained a leaked letter drafted by the CEO’s of the US and Canadian anti-doping agencies, which according to the New York Times was backed by “antidoping officials from at least 10 nations— including those in the United States, Germany, Spain, Japan, Switzerland and Canada — and 20 athlete groups”, urging the International Olympic Committee (IOC) to ban all Russian athletes from the upcoming Olympics.

Source: http://ww4.hdnux.com/photos/50/23/01/10563667/3/920x920.jpg

More...

Brexit and EU law: Beyond the Premier League (Part 1). By Marine Montejo

Editor's note: Marine Montejo is a graduate from the College of Europe in Bruges and is currently an intern at the ASSER International Sports Law Centre.

The result of the Brexit referendum on 23 June 2016 took the European Union (almost) by surprise. A lot has been said and written about the impact of the United Kingdom leaving the EU. As in all other areas, the British sport sector will also face the effects of the modification of the relationship between the EU and its (probable) former Member State, the UK. It is nearly impossible to foresee all consequences as the UK has not even triggered article 50 TFEU yet to officially start the exit negotiations. However, as the UK position toward the EU will change in any case, this two-part blog aims to examine the main practical implications of such an exit for the UK, but also for the EU, in relation to the actual application of EU law in sport and the EU sport policy.

Unless stated otherwise, the use of the terms Brexit in this blog should be understood as a complete exit of the UK from the European Union. This blog focus in particular on this worst case scenario and its consequences for UK sport. However, it is highly improbable that the future Brexit negotiations with the EU will end up without some kind of special agreement between the two parties the first of which being an EEA type of agreement with full access to the internal market and applicability of EU law. 

The first part of this blog will examined the consequences for UK sport in terms of access to the EU internal market and the applicability of free movement principles. The second part is focused on specific impacts with regard of others domain of EU law for professional and grassroots UK sport.  More...

International and European Sports Law – Monthly Report – June 2016. By Kester Mekenkamp

Editor’s note: This report compiles all relevant news, events and materials on International and European Sports Law based on the daily coverage provided on our twitter feed @Sportslaw_asser. You are invited to complete this survey via the comments section below, feel free to add links to important cases, documents and articles we might have overlooked.   


The headlines

What a month June turned out to be. Waking up the morning after the 23rd, the results of the UK referendum on EU membership were final. The words of Mark Twain: “Apparently there is nothing that cannot happen today”, might provide the most apt description of the mood felt at the time.[1] The Leave campaign’s narrow victory has brought along tremendous economic, political and legal uncertainties for both the UK and the (other) Member States. To give but one example, with regard to the implications of Brexit on Europe’s most profiting football league, we recommend an older blog by Daniel Geey and Jonny Madill. More...


The EU State aid and sport saga: The Showdown

It’s been a long wait, but they’re finally here! On Monday, the European Commission released its decisions regarding State aid to seven Spanish professional football clubs (Real Madrid on two occasions) and five Dutch professional football clubs. The decisions mark the end of the formal investigations, which were opened in 2013. The Commission decided as follows: no State aid to PSV Eindhoven (1); compatible aid to the Dutch clubs FC Den Bosch, MVV Maastricht, NEC Nijmegen and Willem II (2); and incompatible aid granted to the Spanish football clubs Real Madrid, FC Barcelona, Valencia CF, Athletic Bilbao, Atlético Osasuna, Elche and Hércules (3). 

The recovery decisions in particular are truly historic. The rules on State aid have existed since the foundation of the European Economic Community in 1958, but it is the very first time that professional football clubs have been ordered to repay aid received from (local) public authorities.[1] In a way, these decisions complete a development set in motion with the Walrave and Koch ruling of 1974, where the CJEU held that professional sporting activity, and therefore also football, is subject to EU law. The landmark Bosman case of 1995 proved to be of great significance as regards free movement of (professional) athletes and the Meca-Medina case of 2006 settled that EU competition rules were equally applicable to the regulatory activity of sport. The fact that the first ever State aid recovery decision concerns major clubs like Real Madrid, FC Barcelona and Valencia, give the decisions extra bite. Therefore, this blog post will focus primarily on the negative/recovery decisions[2], their consequences and the legal remedies available to the parties involved.[3] More...

International and European Sports Law – Monthly Report – May 2016. By Marine Montejo

Editor’s note: This report compiles all relevant news, events and materials on International and European Sports Law based on the daily coverage provided on our twitter feed @Sportslaw_asser. You are invited to complete this survey via the comments section below, feel free to add links to important cases, documents and articles we might have overlooked.   


The Headlines

Challenged membership put a lot of emphasis on football federations in May. The Court of Arbitration for Sport (“CAS”) has rendered an award, on 27 April 2016, ordering the FIFA Council to submit the application of the Gibraltar Football Association (GFA) for FIFA membership to the FIFA Congress (the body authorised to admit new members to FIFA). The GFA has sought since 1999 to become a member of UEFA and FIFA. In May 2013, it became a member of the UEFA and went on to seek membership of FIFA. More...


Operación Puerto Strikes Back!

Forget the European Championship currently held in France or the upcoming Olympic Games in Rio. Doping scandals are making the headlines more than ever in 2016. From tennis star Sharapova receiving a two-year ban for her use of the controversial ‘meldonium’, to the seemingly never-ending doping scandals in athletics. As if this was not enough, a new chapter was added on 14 June to one of the most infamous and obscure doping sagas in history: the Operación Puerto.

The special criminal appeal chamber,  the Audiencia Provincial, has held that the more than 200 blood bags of professional athletes that have been at the center of the investigations since 2006 can be delivered to the relevant sporting authorities, such as the Spanish Anti-Doping Agency (AEPSAD), WADA, the UCI and the Italian Olympic Committee (CONI). In other words, there is now a good chance that the identities of the involved athletes might eventually be revealed.

Source: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/othersports/cycling/9834122/Operation-Puerto-doctor-Eufemiano-Fuentes-treated-tennis-players-athletes-footballers-and-a-boxer.html

This case note will analyze the court’s ruling and summarize its most important findings. Given the amount of time passed since the scandal first came to light (2004), the blog will commence with a short background summary of the relevant facts. More...

Asser International Sports Law Blog | Women’s Football and the Fundamental Right to Occupational Health and Safety: FIFA’s Responsibility to Regulate Female Specific Health Issues - By Ella Limbach

Asser International Sports Law Blog

Our International Sports Law Diary
The Asser International Sports Law Centre is part of the T.M.C. Asser Instituut

Women’s Football and the Fundamental Right to Occupational Health and Safety: FIFA’s Responsibility to Regulate Female Specific Health Issues - By Ella Limbach

Editor's noteElla Limbach is currently completing her master’s degree in International Sport Development and Politics at the German Sport University Cologne. Her interests include human rights of athletes, labour rights in sport, the intersection of gender, human rights and sport and the working conditions in women’s football. Previously, she graduated from Utrecht University with a LL.M in Public International Law with a specialization in International Human Rights Law. This blog was written during Ella's internship at the Asser Institute where she conducted research for the H.E.R.O. project. The topic of this blog is also the subject of her master's thesis.

Women’s football has experienced exponential growth over the past decade, though the professionalization of the women’s game continues to face barriers that can be tied to the historical exclusion of women from football and insufficient investment on many levels. While attendance records have been broken and media coverage has increased, the rise in attention also highlighted the need for special accommodations for female footballers regarding health and safety at the workplace. Female footballers face gender specific circumstances which can have an impact on their health such as menstruation, anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries and the impact of maternity. As the recent ILO Brief on ‘Professional athletes and the fundamental principles and rights at work' states “gender issues related to [occupational health and safety] risks are often neglected (p. 23).” While it could be argued that from a human rights point of view article 13(c) of the Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination of Women stipulates “the right to participate in […] sports [on an equal basis to men],” reality shows that so far practices of men’s football were simply applied to women’s football without taking into consideration the physiological differences between male and female players and the implications that can have for female players’ health. The ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work(ILO Declaration, amended in 2022) includes “a safe and healthy working environment” as one of the fundamental rights at work (Art. 2e). This begs the question whether the scope of the right to occupational health and safety at the workplace includes the consideration of female specific health issues in women’s football.

Scope of the fundamental right to occupational health and safety

 The ILO Declaration also identifies the Convention on Occupational Health and Safety (No. 155, 1981) and the Convention on a Promotional Framework for Occupational Health and Safety (No. 187, 2006) as fundamental frameworks guaranteeing the right to occupational health and safety. In its Brief on ‘Professional athletes and the fundamental principles and rights at work’ the ILO reaffirms that athletes get their right to occupational health and safety through these two conventions. The Occupational Health and Safety Convention “applies to all branches of economic activity (Art. 1),” and as football is a global industry generating billions in revenue, it should be included within the scope of the convention. Article 3 provides that the term health includes physical elements affecting safety at work. Article 4 reads the following: 

1. “Each Member shall, in the light of national conditions and practice, and in consultation with the most representative organisations of employers and workers, formulate, implement and periodically review a coherent national policy on occupational safety, occupational health and the working environment.

2. The aim of the policy shall be to prevent accidents and injury to health arising out of, linked with or occurring in the course of work, by minimising, so far as is reasonably practicable, the causes of hazards inherent in the working environment.” 

Applying this to football, could mean that signatory states of the Occupational Health and Safety Convention shall consult FIFA and their respective national federations, clubs and player unions to mitigate hazards specific to football. Moreover, the employers are obligated to ensure “workplaces, […] equipment and processes under their control are safe and without risk to health (Art. 16(1).” The cost of ensuring safety and health at the workplace shall not be covered by athletes according to article 21. 

The Convention on a Promotional Framework for Occupational Health and Safety emphasizes that “the principle of prevention is accorded the highest priority (Art. 1d).” It also calls for continuous improvement of occupational safety and health in order to prevent injuries (Art. 2). The national policy shall be supported by a national occupational safety and health system which amongst others should include laws and regulations and collective agreements, compliance mechanisms, research and data collection and analysis on occupational injuries and diseases (Art. 4). While maternity is not discussed within the context of the above mentioned conventions, the ILO’s Maternity Protection Convention (No. 183, 2000) protects the health of pregnant or breastfeeding women by ensuring that they are not obliged to perform work which is harmful or poses a risk to the health of the mother or the child (Art. 3). It also stipulates a minimum of 14 weeks maternity leave (Art. 4).

Health concerns specific to women’s football

Female footballers face several barriers that are unique to their experience as women. Generally, there is a lack of education on female physiology and health and how it affects performance. Several risks are specific to women’s football and must be differentiated from the men’s game. Here three different points are assessed: the impact of menstruation on training, performance and injury risk, ACL injuries and maternity. These have already been identified by Martínez-Lagunas, Niessen and Hartmann in 2014 for necessitating specific adaptations to the training of female players due to their difference in physiology compared to men.

First, menstrual cycle disfunctions are not uncommon for athletes. FIFA has recognised the lack of scientific literature on the health of female athletes and has through reviewing current literature developed the FIFA Female Health Projectaiming to provide educational resources for all stakeholders in women’s football. That can include having infrequent periods, not ovulating, heavy bleeding and pain. These can be tied to disease, genetics, as well as stress which is common in the competitive environment of professional football. Stress can be caused by workload, travel and psychological pressure. In addition, if players experience lower energy levels, they are more prone to injury. There are a number of symptoms women experience during their period such as cramps, fatigue, disturbed sleep and back and leg pain. The impact of nutrition on menstrual health also should be monitored, the same applies to hydration. Therefore, health issues related to menstruation should be taken more seriously in football and women players should receive proper care.

Secondly, women’s football has suffered what many describe as an epidemic concerning the number of players suffering ACL injuries. Injuries arising out of being employed as footballers in general are not uncommon, however the rise in ACL injuries is alarming. ACL tears are twice as likely in women, a higher likelihood also recognised by the ILO in its Brief. About two thirds of ACL injuries occur without physical contact. In addition, ACL injuries take between six to twelve months to recover, which has a large impact on a footballer’s career. Not much research has been done on the topic but a few potential reasons as to why that is the case have been identified by stakeholders in women’s football such as FIFPRO and academics especially within the field of sport medicine. For one, football boots and kits are designed based on the male physique and many female players reported having issues with their shoes. Another possible reason for ACL injuries could be inconsistency of the match calendar experienced by some players. Female players experience underload due to fewer teams, shorter seasons and longer breaks as well as long lasting discrimination of the women’s game which impacts its professionalization. However, at the same time parts of an elite player’s season are characterized by overload where players play a high number of games in a short period of time. For some players the increase in workload and decrease in recovery through a packed competition schedule may also be an issue, though this issue does not exclusively impact women’s football. Nevertheless, on the elite level women face less structured match calendar and more precarious conditions regarding medical treatment and recovery.

Thirdly, female players have to arrange their career with family planning. As FIFPRO reports, many women in football had to leave the sport early because they wish to become mothers and current structures in elite football were not allowing both, being a mother and a professional football player. Childcare support and maternity pay are rarely provided. While FIFA has developed protections of players during and after pregnancy, FIFPRO has recently shown that the regulations have not been implemented by most of FIFA’s member associations. Moreover, pregnant professional players previously reported that medical care throughout their pregnancy especially regarding training and support as to which exercises are beneficial during pregnancy are lacking. Lastly, an early return after pregnancy can also lead to health implications if not monitored.

FIFA’s responsibility to ensure respect for ILO Conventions throughout football

FIFA is the world governing body for football and has committed to respecting internationally recognised human rights throughout its activities. The FIFA Statutes state that “FIFA is committed to respecting all internationally recognised human rights and shall strive to promote the protection of these rights.” Moreover, FIFA published a ‘Human Rights Policy’ in 2017, which refers to the UN Guiding Principles for Business and Human Rights (UNGPs). As highlighted by the UNGPs, internationally recognized human rights include at least some ILO Conventions. Therefore, FIFA following its own commitment to respect and strive to promote human rights, should ensure that throughout football minimum standards of health and safety aligned with ILO requirements are in place. FIFA should, therefore, be deemed to be bound under FIFA law to ensure respect with ILO Conventions throughout its activities (including regulations affecting professional football players). In fact, FIFA has started to include a set of ‘Special Provisions Relating to Female Players’ in their Regulations on the Status and Transfer of Players (RSTP). For example, menstruation and maternity leave. 

Current status of female players health regulations by FIFA 

When looking at the risks specific to female players the question arises how FIFA and national football federations contribute to realizing the right to health and safety at work. FIFA has launched the Women’s Health, Wellbeing, and Performance Project in 2023, consulting 20 experts to investigate the female physiology and women’s health challenges. It covers all three topics and should be available to FIFA stakeholders in full soon. Some of its objectives include increased research, awareness, optimized training and access to screening and monitoring tools. It is yet to be seen whether this project will positively impact players health.

The Special Provisions Relating to Female Players included in the Regulations on the Status and Transfer of Players (RSTP) are also relevant here. Indeed, an article related to menstruation has recently been added to FIFA’s RSTP. It requires a club to respect a player’s needs regarding their menstrual cycle and health (Art. 18quinquies), meaning, if a player receives a medical certificate by her gynaecologist or another medical professional, the player has the right to miss trainings or games due to her menstrual health without consequences for her pay. FIFPRO points out that while this does not differentiate from taking a certificate to excuse them from training or games due to illness, it provides legal certainty that menstruation is covered by sick leave.

While research and support on ACL prevention and treatment has been lacking overall, FIFPRO, the Professional Footballer Association England, Nike and Leeds Beckett University have launched a project aiming to reduce ACL injuries in women’s football, the findings of which they will also make available to FIFA. The study will run for three years and examine players of the Women’s Super League which is England’s top-tier women’s football league. They will also track players workload, travel and appearances. From the findings best practice will be identified. 

Finally, FIFA, with support of FIFPRO, established maternity regulations in 2021 which are included in the RSTP (Art. 18quater). These must be implemented by member associations in their national regulations. Female players are now granted a minimum of 14 weeks of maternity leave, including eight weeks after childbirth, two more weeks as required by the ILO Convention. In its latest advocacy, FIFPRO advocated for 10 weeks after childbirth. Additionally, players receive two thirds of their salary during maternity leave. The FIFA RSTP also give players the autonomy to decide when to stop playing while pregnant, as long as it not considered a risk to the health of both player and child, with clubs having to accept the player’s decision. During their pregnancy clubs must also provide the opportunity for players to do alternative work. As of 2024, the RSTP include adoption leave of eight weeks, if the child is under two years old, and family leave for non-childbearing parents of eight weeks (Art. 18(7)). They now also included a postpartum plan and the obligation of clubs to provide adequate ongoing medical support. After already engaging heavily with the topic, FIFPRO recently published a guide on supporting players during pregnancy and in returning to play which was developed “with football players who actually experienced motherhood while they were professionals and with doctors and physiotherapists specialised in maternity in professional sport.” While the RSTPs include a postpartum plan to be agreed between player and club without including recommendations, the question remains in how far the best practices identified in the guide will be transposed by FIFA in the next RSTPs.

The implementation of the rights enshrined in the FIFA RSTP by national federations is still lacking, however. For example, the case of Sara Björk Gunnarsdóttir against her former club Olympique Lyonnais shows that clubs are not necessarily upholding the provisions related to maternity protection. The dispute arose because Lyon failed to continue paying Gunnarsdóttir’s salary during her pregnancy in contravention with FIFA’s maternity regulations, but in line with French law. Gunnarsdóttir won the case before the FIFA Dispute Resolution Chamber. However, (financial) sanctions for non-compliance are often insufficient and not effective in providing incentives for clubs to adhere to the rules, and in the worst case could even lead to national football federations allocating less resources to women’s football, thus also impacting the adherence with the RSTP. There is also a risk of double standards, between national and international players, as rules and regulations may apply differently to them. 

Conclusions and the way forward

The right to health and safety is a fundamental right at work therefore it should also apply to professional female footballers. ILO conventions impose primary duties onto signatories of the Conventions and while FIFA is a Swiss association and thus not directly bound by ILO Conventions, it can be argued that because of its commitments to uphold internationally recognized human rights in line with the UNGPs it should adhere to ILO conventions. In addition to FIFA’s responsibility through its own commitments and as the global regulator of football there are several other duty bearers that play a relevant role. Because member states should consult with representatives of employers one could argue that national football federations and clubs, in their role as employers of players, and the states in which they are located have a shared responsibility to fulfil the right to occupational health and safety at the work for female footballers. Consequently, because the ILO requires that employers create a safe working environment minimizing causes of hazards, having adjusted training programs and doing the necessary research and studies on the health and safety of female footballers will be a necessity for clubs and federations. To provide a practical example, developing football boots adapted to female physicality might be an obligation under article 16(1) of the Occupational Health and Safety Convention.

As has been outlined above, there is no question on whether menstruation, ACL injuries and maternity affect the health and wellbeing of female athletes at the workplace and thus fall under the ILO’s scope of the fundamental right to occupational health and safety at the workplace. While FIFA has begun to work on including female specific health issues in their regulations, the national implementation of the relevant provisions is still lacking efficiency. Thus, more active pursuit of national football associations and club’s adherence should be high on FIFA’s to do list. Moreover, FIFPRO must be credited with a lot of work regarding the implementation of these rights. As the global football players union, it represents the workers in this case and thus it can be seen as a positive step that FIFA is to a certain extent implementing their recommendations. Though it is clear that FIFA needs to take greater responsibility as long as serious issues, such as extensive workload and the impact on players health, continue to be highlighted by FIFPRO without meaningful action by FIFA. Overall, a way forward would include establishing effective mechanisms to ensure that relevant provisions of the RSTP are universally implemented and ultimately stronger sanctions for breaching these provisions.

Comments are closed