New publication on the effect of the UK’s counter-terrorism policies on the rule of lawPublished 12 March 2019
In an upcoming book chapter titled “Individual Terrorist Suspects as the New Folk Devil: New Labour, Rights Tokenism and Security Compulsions”, T.M.C. Asser Instituut's researcher Dr Rumyana van Ark (née Grozdanova) examines the long-term implications of New Labour’s counter-terrorism policies on the rule of law in the United Kingdom. According to Dr. van Ark, individual human rights have been hollowed out by post 9-11 legislative fever.
In May 1997, a triumphant Tony Blair was celebrating Labour’s victory at the polls. By October of the same year, his government was already working on fulfilling their pledge for a comprehensive programme of constitutional reform. Early indications suggested that the promotion of individual rights would form a core component of New Labour’s legislative and policy agenda. Yet, by early 2002, the Anti-Terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001 (ATCSA) was in operation – an Act once described as “the most draconian legislation Parliament has passed in peacetime in over a century”. In her book chapter, Dr Van Ark examines how and why this now repealed legislation continues to have an impact on individual human rights.
From keen endorsement of human rights to enduring championing of counter-terrorism
The comprehensive and highly restrictive nature of the provisions and counter-terrorism measures contained within Anti-Terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001 set the stage for New Labour’s post-2001 approach towards human rights and national security: a perfunctory respect for individual rights in comparison to the exhaustive commitment to counter-terrorism. If New Labour’s legislative and policy record on security matters post 9/11 is to be summarised, Dr Van Ark argues, it would be thus: when faced with a choice between a prompt legislative response to close perceived legal and policy gaps or first exhausting the wide range of legal powers already available, the New Labour chose the former. The counter-terrorism legislative fever which followed the events of 9/11 and the rhetoric surrounding the adoption of each new piece of legislation resulted in a tokenistic approach towards human rights. This tokenism has led to the hollowing out of a number of individual rights such as the right to fair trial.
Dr Van Ark’s book chapter is now available here. The full collection “Twenty Years On: Assessing the Legacy of New Labour’s Constitution” (Hart Publications) edited by Prof. Mike Gordon and Dr Adam Tucker (University of Liverpool) is forthcoming in 2019.
Dr Rumyana van Ark (nee Grozdanova) is part of the Asser research strand Human Dignity and Human Security in International and European Law. This research strand adopts a human rights approach to global challenges in the field of counter-terrorism, international criminal law, international humanitarian law, international trade, environmental protection, European private international law, and the law of EU external relations. It examines what it means to safeguard human dignity - also in relation to human security - in these areas.
New blog: The Shamima Begum case: ‘Revoking citizenship is ineffective and counterproductive’
The decision to revoke Shamima Begum’s UK citizenship is not only ineffective, but it also creates a number of legal and diplomatic problems, according to Asser Institute counter-terrorism experts Drs Christophe Paulussen and Rumyana Grozdanova. Instead, the UK should accept responsibility and rely on its regular criminal justice system.
‘Legislative fever is not a long-term solution for stopping terrorism incitement’
Legislators and policy-makers should put more emphasis, expertise, and resources towards resolving the root causes of terrorism, rather than trying to curb the spread of extremism by feverishly expanding counter-terrorism legislation. That is the main conclusion of a new ICCT Perspective ‘Incitement to Terrorism – Treating the Symptoms or Addressing the Causal Malady?’ by Asser researcher and ICCT research fellow Dr Rumyana Grozdanova.
UK Measures Rendering Terror Suspects Stateless: A Punishment More Primitive Than Torture
In the latest policy measure against the perceived threat of foreign fighters, the UK passed a law that could result in terrorism suspects becoming stateless. Dr Christophe Paulussen and Dr Laura van Waas analyse the bill (ICCT Perspective, 2014)
Policy brief: ‘Counter-terrorism measures need to be evaluated’
Read the full policy brief in which Asser researcher Dr Berenice Boutin discusses methods for evaluating counter-terrorism measures and provides suggestions for policy-makers.
Asser International Crimes Database
The International Crimes Database offers an extensive online collection of international crimes broadly defined, such as genocide, war crimes, terrorism and piracy. It provides access to a range of information, not just for scholars and practitioners (such as judges, prosecutors and defence counsel), but also for students, journalists, families and communities of victims of crimes. It also contains a specific tab dealing with cases of foreign fighters.